Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Generating Fake Photo Views  
User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20319 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FOUNDER

As you know, the view counter on your photos are only counting distinct views, one from each IP address. Naturally, there's always going to be ways around this but misuse has not been a major problem in the past. Our logs of IP addresses, referrers etc show that it does happen but rarely and we normally just remove such views and disable counting of views from that IP in the future.

A recent detailed revision of the view logs have showed a few cases of photographers trying to increase their view count by using scripts and dynamic IP addresses to artificially increase their views and thereby getting a higher standing on top lists and similar on Airliners.net. Such findings have now forced us to add a new and strict rule:

A photographer caught with artificially increasing the view counter of his photos will risk having all his photos removed from our database. We take this issue very seriously and will not hesitate to take action when we find proof of this behavior in our logs.

This new rule is active as of right now. Any photographers that are currently using any method to artificially increase your view count should stop immediately or risk having your photos removed.

Note that normal use, such as viewing your own photos is not prohibited at all - only excessive use.

Sincerely,
Johan Lundgren


Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright
62 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1375 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20147 times:

well, I defenetely know one photographer who does this .... , I reecntly sent this guy an email asking how come that every photo of him has such a high view ..... , even normal easyjet takeoff hit nearly 1000 views .... , he answered : well cause people like my photos .....

well done A.NET !!!! KICK THOSE A... OUT OF THE DB!!!!!

Robin


Nothing beats a perfect slide!
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States, joined Sep 2001, 8396 posts, RR: 66
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20134 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Nice work Johan, it is nice to see that months of discussion there has been a firm policy put in place. It is pathetic that a few photographers are so desperate for attention that they feel the need to cheat, not only themselves but others as well.


I've been dating too. Nice girl, she's an author. She wrote the book on male sexual dysfunction. You've probably read it
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20097 times:

Hi all,

Good work Johan, hunt the guilty down and punish them, that stinks and also shows how sad some people are that they would do such a thing.

Cheers

Ben Pritchard

User currently offlineSulman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1924 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20091 times:

I think one of them has already gone.


Cheers


James


more like polishmig29s.net am I rite
User currently offlineEmbraer145 From Netherlands, joined Feb 2001, 311 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20075 times:

Absolutely Great News.

Now we see which pictures are really atracting a lot of people. As mentioned earlier 1000+ hits for a departing easyJet or KLM B737 is strange.

Hopefully we get a clean number of counts now.

In my opinion all the plugging of pictures must be forbidden. Let the visitors decide what pictures are popular. Not somebody with a lot of spare time  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers
Aart


DAI - Dutch Aviation Images.
User currently offlineVir380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20063 times:

James , you may be right you may be wrong  Wink/being sarcastic

but still .... i personally cannot see why its so essential for people to fake this facility , cant we just aim for having the "shot" thats deserves it purley on merit  Smile


regards Tony



User currently offline707cmf From France, joined Mar 2002, 4883 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20046 times:

In my opinion all the plugging of pictures must be forbidden. Let the visitors decide what pictures are popular. Not somebody with a lot of spare time

rhaa, that would be the end of life as we know it in Elbonia, if plugging was forbidden !!!

Cheers,

707, formerly guilty of imfamous plugging  Innocent

Edit : typo

[Edited 2005-01-27 17:32:22]

User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 820 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20044 times:

I can't agree more, why would someone bother going to all that trouble to generate a few hundred hits for themselves? What do they gain apart for generating a whole lot of work for the site admin. Get rid of them and let people know who they are so they can't repeat their acts.

Jid.




G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineThom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11739 posts, RR: 42
Reply 9, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20037 times:

That sounds only fair to me. But I suppose the plugs in the forums are still allowed?  Big grin

Thom@s


"Not all who wander are lost" - J.R.R Tolkien
User currently offlineSulman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1924 posts, RR: 28
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20034 times:

It may be a good idea to handle it the way pbase does, which is to hide the hits from public view, so only the account owner has that information.

There is still a 'popular' section but you don't see any numbers.


Of course such a system would still be open to exploitation but at least it takes the emphasis away from pure hit-counts.


James

[Edited 2005-01-27 17:33:10]


more like polishmig29s.net am I rite
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States, joined Sep 2001, 8396 posts, RR: 66
Reply 11, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 20006 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I can't agree more, why would someone bother going to all that trouble to generate a few hundred hits for themselves

Well, its all about their ego, and we aren't talking a few hundred hits...we are talking about several hundred thousand, if not a million.




[Edited 2005-01-27 17:39:18]


I've been dating too. Nice girl, she's an author. She wrote the book on male sexual dysfunction. You've probably read it
User currently offlineAirbusfanYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2002, 1337 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 19956 times:

Call me naive but I am a little shocked that people would resort to such tactics. Well done Johan, this action is definitely appreciated by this photographer!

Cheers,
Kaz


t.dot photography - www.tdotphoto.com
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States, joined Dec 2004, 8796 posts, RR: 39
Reply 13, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19885 times:

I'm just happy to see one of my myaviation.net photos almost reach 50 views.  Big grin

Harry


Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineTWAMD-80 From United States, joined Oct 2001, 987 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19880 times:

Well, its all about their ego, and we aren't talking a few hundred hits...we are talking about several hundred thousand, if not a million.

Wow! It sounds like some people have a few problems!!! I wonder if they think it's not noticeable when they jump 10,000 hits???

Tim


Three useless things in Aviation: 1-Runway behind you 2-Altitude above you 3-Air in the fuel tanks
User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2029 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19867 times:

Fake hits! Wow, why didn't I think of that?
 Nuts

/JM


AirPixPro online
User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3407 posts, RR: 60
Reply 16, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19839 times:

Fake hits! Wow, why didn't I think of that?

Because your images get lots of hits without plugging or cheating?  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
The world is baaaad  Insane

Florian

[Edited 2005-01-27 19:12:18]


AirTeamImages - take the high road and others will follow
User currently offlineKC7MMI From United States, joined Oct 2003, 854 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19827 times:

Wow, some photographers have a lot of time on their hands...those bastards!  Laugh out loud

User currently offlineMauriceB From Aruba, joined Aug 2004, 2141 posts, RR: 23
Reply 18, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 19826 times:

way to go A.net, as you can see at my views i never fake it , lol


''A.net just like flying, but without the peanuts. doesn't bother me , i never eat peanuts on flights!
User currently offlineKalim From Poland, joined Jan 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 19759 times:

so if i have my favourite picture as a homepage i should change that for another site??

User currently offlineUa777222 From United States, joined Dec 2003, 2829 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 19656 times:

Now when I have a picture that I like that I have uploaded I will normally leave it in its own window for the first say 4-6hours so that periodically I can re-upload the page to see the count. Now when I re-upload the page it won't count my view which I don't care about b/c I'm not really about views but does that create an issue on your end in terms of unfair hits?

Thanks again and if I need not to do this please let me know.

Thanks again  Wink/being sarcastic

Ua777222


"It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark."
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States, joined Sep 2001, 8396 posts, RR: 66
Reply 21, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 19615 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

dude, your post doesn't make any sense.

"so that periodically I can re-upload the page to see the count"

"I don't care about b/c I'm not really about views"

LOL, which is it?

And no, it isn't a violation of the rules, you can view your own pictures as often as you want, lol.


I've been dating too. Nice girl, she's an author. She wrote the book on male sexual dysfunction. You've probably read it
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States, joined Dec 2004, 8796 posts, RR: 39
Reply 22, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 19612 times:

It is unique views, so if you just keep reloading it won't effect the view count.

Harry


Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineUa777222 From United States, joined Dec 2003, 2829 posts, RR: 11
Reply 23, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 19592 times: